CP2104 and CP2102

This is the CP2104 and CP2102 explained. When it comes to USB-to-UART bridge controllers, the CP2104 and CP2102 are two popular options made by Silicon Labs. While these two chips are similar in many ways, there are several key differences that make them better suited for different applications.

CP2104 and CP2102

One of the biggest differences between the CP2104 and CP2102 is the maximum baud rate they support. The 2104 is capable of supporting baud rates up to 3 Mbps. Which is significantly higher than the maximum baud rate of 921.6 kbps for the 2102. This higher baud rate makes the CP2104 a better choice for applications that require fast data transfer speeds, such as industrial automation, robotics, and data acquisition. See also the CP2102 USB & UART signals on here as well as the RTL8187 Wireless Driver Windows 7 as well.

Another difference between the two chips is the built-in features and peripherals they offer. The 2104 has several additional features compared to the 2102, including a 10-bit ADC and two 8-bit DACs. These built-in peripherals make the CP2104 a more versatile option for applications that require analog signal measurement and control. Additionally, the CP2104 has more GPIO pins and a built-in voltage regulator, which can simplify the design of a system that uses the chip.

In terms of package and pinout. The CP2104 and CP2102 are similar. Both chips come in a 28-pin QFN package, but the pin assignments and functionality of some pins are different between the two chips. This means that careful consideration must be taken when designing a circuit using either chip. Also see the CP2104 USB to UART Driver as well as the CP2102 USB to UART Bridge Driver.

See also  UART Drivers

Chip Advantages

While the CP2104 offers several advantages over the CP2102, there are some cases where the CP2102 may be a better choice. For example, the CP2102 is a lower-cost option than the CP2104, which may be important for cost-sensitive applications. Additionally, the CP2102 has been on the market longer than the CP2104, so there may be more resources and support available for it. Likewise see the D-Link Routers AirPlus on here.

In terms of software compatibility. Both the CP2104 and CP2102 are compatible with the same drivers and software. Likewise which means that migrating between the two chips is relatively easy. There is also the CP2102 driver and the Visioneer OneTouch 9520 USB as well.

To summarize, they are two USB-to-UART bridge controllers that offer similar functionality. Likewise they do differ in several key areas. The CP2104 offers higher baud rates and more built-in features. This making it a better choice for applications that require fast data transfer speeds and advanced functionality. However, the CP2102 is a lower-cost option that may be better suited for cost-sensitive applications. Ultimately, the choice between these two chips depends on the specific needs of the application and the design constraints. Finally also see the wd ses device usb device driver on here.